Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moulana Syed Hasan Imdad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Moulana Syed Hasan Imdad

Moulana Syed Hasan Imdad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR .Now there are thousands of Islamic Religious scholars now it is not clear as too how the particular Subject is notable. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

• Delete : There is a very little information about the person and his contributions . Poorly sourced and it does not seem the person meet standards of notability and of WP:BLP .(Remi143(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:GNG. About the current sources source: unreliable as in self-published and only 1(!) mention in the whole 56-page pdf, but only as the one who translated some book into Urdu. This effectively makes the article an unreferenced BLP. Googled "Syed Hasan Imdad" (without the honorific Moulana): nothing on GNews, 1 passing mention in some list on GBooks. - HyperGaruda (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.