Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard Haze
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Leonard Haze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently self-written, article does nothing to demonstrate any notability as a single member of a dubiously-notable band. King Öomie 13:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur: I have no doubt this is OR and it lacks any notability.--LeyteWolfer (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I didn't see any notable mentions on Google and Yahoo aside from music download sites and YouTube. SwisterTwister talk 19:57, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -There's no reason for this article to exist, especially since the singer by himself is not a notable persona. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete Nothing substantial about this (auto-esque)biography: no reliable 3rd party sources.Curb Chain (talk) 21:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.